In the article Civil War Raises Questions about When to
Intervene it talks about whether the United States should intervene in the civil
war in Syria I think the united states shouldn’t intervene at all because they
have their own problems to deal with and to be worrying about someone else’s is
dumb its dumb because it’s like a saying how you going to fix someone else’s
house and your house is a mess and not fixed. I’m not saying it’s not good to
help people or anything because it’s always good to do that, but what if Syria starts
attacking us and was in another war that would be just foolish because the U.S
always finds their way into something. The U.S said they would intervene if
they use chemical weapons, but what would be the point of that if you are
killing someone a kill is a kill what does it matter whether it’s with a gun or
a chemical. I think the U.S is just saying that so they can just get in this
war because usually in war they use any and everything to kill the enemy a gun
a bomb whatever it takes so to me it sounds like they just want to be in it.
Good, but short.
ReplyDeleteI think your metaphor mostly works, but remember that while the US "house" could use some fixing up, the Syrian "house" is about to fall down. There is a difference when innocent people are being slaughtered. 80